Jeremy Goldstein’s on Stock Options and their benefits to corporations

Jeremy Goldstein is an attorney who has specialized in employees advisory and compliance services. He is a partner at Jeremy L. Goldstein & Associates LLC which is a boutique law firm which is committed to advice firms and executives involved in business. Due to his competence and fifteen years of experience as a business lawyer, most corporations have sort out Jeremy Goldstein for help regarding employee benefits.

Jeremy Goldstein has had tremendous achievements. He has been involved in major successful transactions involving top companies like Verizon and Chevron. Goldstein independently established a law firm in New York after working as a partner at a similar organization.


Jeremy has been serving as a board member of a prestigious law journal and being involved in a non-profit organization known as Fountain house. Jeremy has had priceless advice for business persons on how stock options as a type of compensation can be advantageous to them.

He urges stock options is a simple subject for employees, and they can understand it easily, and it can be used for additional wages, equities or to make insurance coverage better. Jeremy adds that stock options can help a company when the value of the company’s shares rises. Consequently, the rise in the firm`s share value leads to increase in the personal earnings for the employees which motivates them to work with the company’s interest at heart knowing that their interest is taken care of.

Stock options also help business not face greater tax burdens mostly if they are involved in providing equities. Jeremy goes ahead to add that if stocks are to work well for a company, then it must introduce a type of ‘barrier’ known as ‘knockouts.’ In this case, employees can consider canceling options in cases where the value of the share falls under an agreed amount, for a considerably extended period of at least one week.

Most stockholders would be curious to know whether using the knockout mechanism would threaten their ownership shares by shrinking them. The good news is that it does not, and this is simply because the non-employee investors, in this case, the stockholders would face no overhang threats because there are benefits that come with the knockout options.

Jeremy Goldstein Explains How Knockout Options Help Employers. In the past few years, numerous organizations have stopped providing workers with stock options mechanisms. Some corporations put an end to the knockout stock plan to save money,although the reasons behind such decisions seem to be complex in many companies. Learn more:

Jeremy Goldstein: Why Stock Options are the Best Way to Go

Not a lot of people these days understand what stock options are. Back in the day, more people paid attention to the stock market and planned for retirement as a way of life. These days, people tend to live in the here and now.

Stock options aren’t as appealing as they used to be. For that reason, many corporations have stopped providing stock options as an employee benefit. Since this trend has taken effect, there a lot of business lawyers and experts, like Jeremy Goldstein, advising against this new trend.

While every corporation has its own reasons for doing this, they are three main reasons they seem to all have in common. For once, money isn’t really the issue here. It’s more about how corporations and their employees feel about stock options. Lately, stock options seem to have more disadvantages than advantages.

First, stock values can drop like a rock. People have seen stock values be up one day and take a tremendous fall the next day. If a stock falls too low, employees lose their ability to exercise that option, potentially leaving them in option overhang. Corporations don’t want that risk anymore.

Not only do corporations not want that risk; employees don’t want to risk either. That’s the second reason more corporations are offering different types of benefits. Employees don’t want potentially worthless stocks when they can have real cash they can control. Stock benefits behave too much like casino tokens.

Also, corporations don’t want to deal with all the paperwork and accounting burdens. It’s just easier to offer things like higher salaries, equities, or more personalized insurance coverage. While those benefits all sound amazing, Jeremy Goldstein still recommends that corporations give stock options another chance. In the end, stock options might be more preferable. Learn more:

Jeremy Goldstein is a highly educated business lawyer with over 15 years of experience. His experience started back in his college days. He has degrees from New York University School of Law, the University of Chicago, and Cornell University. After college, he started working at Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen, and Katz.

After perfecting his craft, he opened his own boutique law firm, Jeremy L. Goldstein and Associates LLC. Since then, he’s become most corporations’ go-to guy when it comes to compensation advice.


Lawyer Jeremy Goldstein

Jeremy explains why employers have stopped giving stock options to their employees in one of his articles. He explains that the value of a stock dropping can lead to the risk of overhanging. Another reason is that the stock benefits don’t seem realistic but behaves like tokens which do not give that warm cash feeling. The option also can lead to a tax burden on a company.

The option has its own advantages in that it is an easier method of employees understanding of stock options, it encourages hard work as its value increases with the performance of the company and it is a better option as compared to issuing shares.

According to Jeremy, the best solution is embracing knock out, a type of barrier option. As the name suggests, if a company’s share value drops significantly, the share expires. The option reduces accounting costs and overhang threats to non-employees. Knock out option reduces the executive compensation on their yearly disclosure documents. It also gives employees strong incentives.

In as long as the knock out option seems to have a solution, Jeremy notes that it is not absolute in nature. In this case, various considerations need to be put in place. There need to be an effective communication channel between the company officials and the auditor about the option being given to the employees. The companies’ accountants need to be keen on how they treat this stock option to prevent misinterpretation of the financial statements.

Jeremy Goldstein is always passionate about seeing companies succeed. A company’s success means better lives for a company’s employees. He always gives advice to both employees and employers, teaching them more about how to become better. In his articles, he talks about communication within an organization. He insists that it should be a productive communication whether it was a vertical or horizontal in nature.

Jeremy Goldstein is a boutique partner at Jeremy L. Goldstein & associates LLC. He has been in the leadership position and has helped in acquisitions of some of the largest company brands. His involvement in these acquisitions has helped him to gain more knowledge and experience in Law.

Jeremy Goldstein serves as a chairman of Acquisition & Mergers subcommittee. He also writes and speaks on executive compensation and corporate governance. Most of his achievements can be related to his understanding of the law thus working within the specified boundaries and making few mistakes. Learn more: